There are around four million CCTV cameras in Britain yet only a fraction actually solve any crimes.


Earlier this week a private memo from the Metropolitan Police found that fewer than one crime is solved by every 1,000 closed circuit television cameras.

Part of the problem is that the quality of the footage is not good enough to be used in court.The other difficulty is the time it takes to analyze just a day’s worth of footage.

Do you agree? Do you find CCTV cameras are any good at preventing crime?

Or do people intent on breaking the law just ignore them?

Do you think politicians have often used CCTV cameras as an excuse not to pay for more bobbies on the beat?

Have you ever been a victim of crime, which you thought would be cleared up by CCTV cameras, only to find that the camera was not working, or the quality of the images was too poor?

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Share  Twitter

Comment

You need to be a member of CCTVBLOG.NET to add comments!

Join this Ning Network

ApexCCTV Comment by ApexCCTV on November 11, 2009 at 2:18pm
I agree with Erik.

The number of criminals actually caught on tape and identified may be lower than we would like, but the number of prevented crimes, due to the presence of cameras and alarms, would be quite impressive, I'm sure, if we actually had a count.

As quality increases and cost continues to decrease, for decent-quality surveillance equipment, it will be easier for us professionals to convince, for the lack of a better word, homeowners and small businesses to purchase security systems that will be able to ID criminals, rather than simply deter them.
Erik Johnson Comment by Erik Johnson on September 25, 2009 at 12:40am
I am a big believer in CCTV. There is no doubt it makes it more difficult for people to get away with a crime. If a criminal pulls into a neighborhood with an intention to commit a crime I am sure they will drive right by the house that has CCTV cameras mounted and hit a house with out cameras. Why take the added risk. If a CCTV camera can stop just one crime or catch one criminal I am all for it! The one statistic you can't count is how many crimes did not happen because the criminals looked up and saw they were on camera!

Twitter

Latest Activity

Duncan Ross and IU Team are now friends
on Saturday
Frankie cordova added a blog post
Image via Wikipedia After a brief welcome from NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg, in which he said his city was the most likely terror target in the USA, DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano told a meeting of her Homeland Security Advisory Council on Februar…
on Thursday
ApexCCTV added a blog post
Welcome to the February 4, 2010 edition of the Security Cameras and CCTV Practices blog carnival. We got several decent submissions this month everyone, so keep them coming and we'll try to include everything we can! Remember, try to keep it releva…
on Thursday
KBC products cannot meet CE requirements since they have no SAFETY TESTING!
on Thursday
KBC Networks also FAIL TO MEET FCC part 15 REQUIREMENTS. KBC rack and fiber optics products have been tested by TUV and FAIL FCC requirements!
on Thursday
George Jay Lichtblau added a blog post
KBC Networks, a manufacturer of fiber optic and IP transmission equipment has been directed by UL to REMOVE ALL MENTION OF UL on their data sheets. KBC Networks has been falsely advertising that all of their products are UL listed!
on Thursday
George Jay Lichtblau is now a member of CCTVBLOG.NET
on Thursday
Frankie cordova added 11 blog posts
February 2

About

BidCCTV.com

Badge

Loading…

© 2010   Created by Frankie cordova

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy  |  Terms of Service